Fiat G 190 or URSUS 1934?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the G 190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1934 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fiat G 190 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 117% (68.1 L/min / 18.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 37% (2,670 kg / 5,886 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | G 190 | 1934 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 139.8 kW (187.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 140 kW (188 hp)Wikipedia (pl): Ursus 1934 (open data) | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1934 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the G 190 and the 1934. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the G 190 and the 1934. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 126.1 L/min (33.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 58.0 L/min (15.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | AheadThe Fiat G 190 has 117% more hydraulic flow (68.1 L/min / 18.0 gpm) than the URSUS 1934 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 9,870 kg (21,760 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | AheadThe Fiat G 190 has 37% more lift (2,670 kg / 5,886 lb) than the URSUS 1934 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,748 kg (19,286 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 6,180 kg (13,625 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat G 190 is 42% heavier (2,568 kg / 5,661 lb) than the URSUS 1934 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1934. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 16Wikipedia (pl): Ursus 1934 (open data) | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the G 190 and the 1934. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | AheadThe URSUS 1934 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat G 190 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–2002 | 2001–2009 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 1934 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fiat G 190 has 117% more hydraulic flow (68.1 L/min / 18.0 gpm) than the URSUS 1934 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat G 190 has 37% more lift (2,670 kg / 5,886 lb) than the URSUS 1934 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat G 190 is 42% heavier (2,568 kg / 5,661 lb) than the URSUS 1934 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The URSUS 1934 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat G 190 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The URSUS 1934 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1934 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources