Fiat G 190 or Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fiat G 190: hydraulic flow, three-point lift and maximum permissible mass. On features, the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A is ahead on forward gears and PTO speeds.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.
  • The Fiat G 190 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 137% (72.8 L/min / 19.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 75% (4,230 kg / 9,326 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Fiat G 190 suits road haulage better on this data: 56% (5,000 kg / 11,023 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat G 190 and Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A, with the call on each
QuestionG 190MF 8160 ACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?133.8 kW (179.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190”133.2 kW (178.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the G 190 and the MF 8160 A.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the G 190 and the MF 8160 A.
Which pumps more oil for implements?126.1 L/min (33.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190”53.3 L/min (14.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160”AheadThe Fiat G 190 has 137% more hydraulic flow (72.8 L/min / 19.2 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?9,870 kg (21,760 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190”5,640 kg (12,434 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160”AheadThe Fiat G 190 has 75% more lift (4,230 kg / 9,326 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?8,748 kg (19,286 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190”6,720 kg (14,815 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat G 190 is 30% heavier (2,028 kg / 4,471 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190”9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160”AheadThe Fiat G 190 has 56% higher maximum permissible mass (5,000 kg / 11,023 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190”30 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A has 67% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Fiat G 190 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the G 190 and the MF 8160 A.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat G 190 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–20021995–1999EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat G 190 has 137% more hydraulic flow (72.8 L/min / 19.2 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat G 190 has 75% more lift (4,230 kg / 9,326 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat G 190 is 30% heavier (2,028 kg / 4,471 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat G 190 has 56% higher maximum permissible mass (5,000 kg / 11,023 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A has 67% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Fiat G 190 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat G 190 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources