Fiat G 190 or Ford 8770?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fiat G 190: three-point lift.
- The Fiat G 190 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 32% (2,390 kg / 5,269 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | G 190 | 8770 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 133.8 kW (179.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 133.8 kW (179.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the G 190 and the 8770. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the G 190 and the 8770. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 126.1 L/min (33.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 126.1 L/min (33.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 9,870 kg (21,760 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 7,480 kg (16,491 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | AheadThe Fiat G 190 has 32% more lift (2,390 kg / 5,269 lb) than the Ford 8770 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,748 kg (19,286 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 8,748 kg (19,286 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8770. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the G 190 and the 8770. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8770. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G190” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–2002 | 1993–1999 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fiat G 190 has 32% more lift (2,390 kg / 5,269 lb) than the Ford 8770 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources