Fiat F-140 DT or WHITE 140?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the F-140 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fiat F-140 DT suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 97% (3,240 kg / 7,143 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat F-140 DT and WHITE 140, with the call on each
QuestionF-140 DT140Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?103 kW (138 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT”103 kW (138 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 140”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the F-140 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the F-140 DT and the 140.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the F-140 DT and the 140.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the F-140 DT and the 140.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,567 kg (14,478 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT”3,327 kg (7,335 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 140”AheadThe Fiat F-140 DT has 97% more lift (3,240 kg / 7,143 lb) than the WHITE 140 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,615 kg (12,379 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT”5,625 kg (12,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 140”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,600 kg (18,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 140.
Which has the wider choice of gears?24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT”18Traktorenlexikon, “White 140”AheadThe Fiat F-140 DT has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the WHITE 140 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the F-140 DT and the 140.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 140”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 140”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 140”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the F-140 DT.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 140”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19961987–1990Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat F-140 DT is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat F-140 DT has 97% more lift (3,240 kg / 7,143 lb) than the WHITE 140 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat F-140 DT has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the WHITE 140 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat F-140 DT is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the F-140 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources