Fiat F-130 DT or VALMET 8200?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the F-130 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The VALMET 8200 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (10.9 L/min / 2.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat F-130 DT and VALMET 8200, with the call on each
QuestionF-130 DT8200Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?95.7 kW (128.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”95.6 kW (128.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the F-130 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the F-130 DT and the 8200.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the F-130 DT and the 8200.
Which pumps more oil for implements?56.5 L/min (14.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”67.4 L/min (17.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200”AheadThe VALMET 8200 has 19% more hydraulic flow (10.9 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Fiat F-130 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,567 kg (14,478 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 8200.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,450 kg (12,015 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”4,700 kg (10,362 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat F-130 DT is 16% heavier (750 kg / 1,653 lb) than the VALMET 8200 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the F-130 DT and the 8200.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8200.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19961993–1996EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 8200 has 19% more hydraulic flow (10.9 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Fiat F-130 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat F-130 DT is 16% heavier (750 kg / 1,653 lb) than the VALMET 8200 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the F-130 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources