Fiat F-130 DT or IMT 5130/5136?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fiat F-130 DT: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears.

  • The Fiat F-130 DT suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 46% (17.7 L/min / 4.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat F-130 DT and IMT 5130/5136, with the call on each
QuestionF-130 DT5130/5136Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?84.0 kW (112.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”84.2 kW (112.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the F-130 DT and the 5130/5136.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the F-130 DT and the 5130/5136.
Which pumps more oil for implements?56.5 L/min (14.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”38.8 L/min (10.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”AheadThe Fiat F-130 DT has 46% more hydraulic flow (17.7 L/min / 4.7 gpm) than the IMT 5130/5136 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,567 kg (14,478 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 5130/5136.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,450 kg (12,015 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”5,315 kg (11,718 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5130/5136.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”10 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”AheadThe Fiat F-130 DT has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the IMT 5130/5136 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the F-130 DT and the 5130/5136.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”independentTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F130 DT”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19961982–1992Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat F-130 DT is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat F-130 DT has 46% more hydraulic flow (17.7 L/min / 4.7 gpm) than the IMT 5130/5136 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat F-130 DT has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the IMT 5130/5136 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat F-130 DT is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources