Fiat F-120 DT or SAME Antares 110?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat F-120 DT and SAME Antares 110, with the call on each
QuestionF-120 DTAntares 110Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?75.9 kW (101.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”75.8 kW (101.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the F-120 DT and the Antares 110.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the F-120 DT and the Antares 110.
Which pumps more oil for implements?56.5 L/min (14.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”61.7 L/min (16.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,440 kg (9,789 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”5,190 kg (11,442 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the F-120 DT: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”); the Antares 110: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,370 kg (11,839 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”4,855 kg (10,703 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat F-120 DT is 11% heavier (515 kg / 1,135 lb) than the SAME Antares 110 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”24 to 48Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the F-120 DT and the Antares 110.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”540/540E/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Antares 110.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19931991–1996EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat F-120 DT is 11% heavier (515 kg / 1,135 lb) than the SAME Antares 110 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the F-120 DT: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”); the Antares 110: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources