Fiat 850 (DT) or VALMET 705/705-4?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the VALMET 705/705-4 is ahead on top speed; the Fiat 850 (DT) is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The Fiat 850 (DT) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The VALMET 705/705-4 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 850 (DT) and VALMET 705/705-4, with the call on each
Question850 (DT)705/705-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?57.0 kW (76.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 850/850 DT”57.4 kW (77.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 705”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 850 (DT) and the 705/705-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 850 (DT) and the 705/705-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?48.0 L/min (12.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 705”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 850 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,712 kg (5,979 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 850/850 DT”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 705/705-4.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,325 kg (7,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 850/850 DT”3,790 kg (8,356 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 705”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 705/705-4 is 14% heavier (465 kg / 1,025 lb) than the Fiat 850 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,030 kg (13,294 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 850/850 DT”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 705/705-4.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 850/850 DT”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 705”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 850 (DT) and the 705/705-4.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 850/850 DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 705”AheadThe VALMET 705/705-4 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fiat 850 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 850/850 DT”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 705”AheadThe Fiat 850 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 705/705-4 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 705”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 850 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 850/850 DT”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 705”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1969–19751983–1989Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 705/705-4 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 705/705-4 is 14% heavier (465 kg / 1,025 lb) than the Fiat 850 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 705/705-4 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fiat 850 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 850 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 705/705-4 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The VALMET 705/705-4 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources