Fiat 80-R or Hanomag Robust 900 (S)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 80-R has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Robust 900 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 80-R | Robust 900 (S) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 61.8 kW (82.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 80 R” | 62 kW (83 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 900 (S)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-R has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Robust 900 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80-R and the Robust 900 (S). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80-R and the Robust 900 (S). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 80 R” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Robust 900 (S). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,800 kg (6,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 80 R” | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 900 (S)” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,550 kg (7,826 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 80 R” | 3,200 kg (7,055 lb) to 3,730 kg (8,223 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 900 (S)” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80-R and the Robust 900 (S). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 80 R” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 900 (S)” | AheadThe Hanomag Robust 900 (S) has 140% more forward gears (7 gears) than the Fiat 80-R (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80-R and the Robust 900 (S). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 80 R” | 19.87 km/h (12.3 mph) to 27.15 km/h (16.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 900 (S)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 80 R” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 900 (S)” | AheadThe Hanomag Robust 900 (S) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 80-R does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 80-R and the Robust 900 (S). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 80 R” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 900 (S)” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1961–1967 | 1967–1969 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hanomag Robust 900 (S) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hanomag Robust 900 (S) has 140% more forward gears (7 gears) than the Fiat 80-R (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Hanomag Robust 900 (S) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 80-R does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Hanomag Robust 900 (S) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-R has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Robust 900 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources