Fiat 80-66 F (DT/F) vs Massey Ferguson MF 393 (A)

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1984–1991

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1987–1994

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 80-66 F (DT/F) and the MF 393 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Fiat 80-66 F (DT/F) and Massey Ferguson MF 393 (A), field by field
Field	80-66 F (DT/F)	MF 393 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	79.0 hp	79.0 hp	—
Engine declared	FIAT-IVECO 8045.05.206 or 306	Perkins A 4.248	differs
Displacement declared	3.91 L	4.07 L	—
Maximum torque declared	185 lb·ft · 251 N·m	215 lb·ft · 291 N·m	+16% MF 393 (A)
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Dry Valeo or LuK double clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Open centre	—
Pressure declared	—	2,756 psi · 190 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	6,393 lb · 2,900 kg	5,291 lb · 2,400 kg	+21% 80-66 F (DT/F)
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	4,497 lb · 2,040 kg	6,437 lb · 2,920 kg	+43% MF 393 (A)
Wheelbase declared	78.8 in · 2,001 mm	92.2 in · 2,341 mm	+17% MF 393 (A)
Length declared	121.7 in · 3,090 mm	150.0 in · 3,810 mm	+23% MF 393 (A)
Width declared	65.7 in · 1,670 mm	77.8 in · 1,975 mm	+18% MF 393 (A)
Height declared	53.7 in · 1,365 mm	91.5 in · 2,325 mm	+70% MF 393 (A)
Ground clearance declared	17.1 in · 435 mm	21.3 in · 540 mm	+24% MF 393 (A)
Turning radius, braked declared	—	13.5 ft · 4.11 m	—
Fuel tank declared	52.8 qt · 50.0 L	90.9 qt · 86.0 L	+72% MF 393 (A)

Source

Source