Fiat 72-94 (DT) or Hürlimann H-307 XE?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 72-94 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-307 XE has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fiat 72-94 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 48% (14.5 L/min / 3.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 72-94 (DT) and Hürlimann H-307 XE, with the call on each
Question72-94 (DT)H-307 XECall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 307”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 72-94 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-307 XE has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 72-94 (DT) and the H-307 XE.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 72-94 (DT) and the H-307 XE.
Which pumps more oil for implements?44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 307”AheadThe Fiat 72-94 (DT) has 48% more hydraulic flow (14.5 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-307 XE (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”1,928 kg (4,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 307”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 72-94 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”); the H-307 XE: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 307”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,460 kg (7,628 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”2,680 kg (5,908 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 307”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 72-94 (DT) is 29% heavier (780 kg / 1,720 lb) than the Hürlimann H-307 XE (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,300 kg (11,684 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-307 XE.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 307”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 72-94 (DT) and the H-307 XE.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 307”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 307”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-307 XE.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 307”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19961993–2004EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat 72-94 (DT) has 48% more hydraulic flow (14.5 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-307 XE (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 72-94 (DT) is 29% heavier (780 kg / 1,720 lb) than the Hürlimann H-307 XE (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 72-94 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-307 XE has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 72-94 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”); the H-307 XE: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 307”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources