Fiat 715 (DT) or J.I. Case 1390 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 715 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1390 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The J.I. Case 1390 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 24% (6.4 L/min / 1.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The J.I. Case 1390 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 715 (DT) | 1390 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 715/715 DT” | 49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1390” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 715 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1390 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 715 (DT) and the 1390 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 715 (DT) and the 1390 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 26.5 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 715/715 DT” | 32.9 L/min (8.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1390” | AheadThe J.I. Case 1390 (DT) has 24% more hydraulic flow (6.4 L/min / 1.7 gpm) than the Fiat 715 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,250 kg (4,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 715/715 DT” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1390 (DT). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,880 kg (6,349 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 715/715 DT” | 2,886 kg (6,363 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1390” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 715 (DT) and the 1390 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 14Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 715/715 DT” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1390” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 715 (DT) and the 1390 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 24 km/h (14.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 715/715 DT” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1390” | AheadThe J.I. Case 1390 (DT) has 25% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the Fiat 715 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 715/715 DT” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1390” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1390” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 715 (DT). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 715/715 DT” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1390” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1966–1969 | 1980–1984 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 1390 (DT) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The J.I. Case 1390 (DT) has 24% more hydraulic flow (6.4 L/min / 1.7 gpm) than the Fiat 715 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 1390 (DT) has 25% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the Fiat 715 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 1390 (DT) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 715 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1390 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources