Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) or International Harvester Hydro 70?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 70-66 F (DT/F) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Hydro 70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The International Harvester Hydro 70 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 39% (12.7 L/min / 3.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The International Harvester Hydro 70 suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (4.0 km/h / 2.5 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) and International Harvester Hydro 70, with the call on each
Question70-66 F (DT/F)Hydro 70Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 70-66 F/70-66 F/DT”51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 70-66 F (DT/F) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Hydro 70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 70-66 F (DT/F) and the Hydro 70.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 70-66 F (DT/F) and the Hydro 70.
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.8 L/min (8.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 70-66 F/70-66 F/DT”45.5 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70”AheadThe International Harvester Hydro 70 has 39% more hydraulic flow (12.7 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,648 kg (5,838 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 70-66 F/70-66 F/DT”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Hydro 70.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,940 kg (4,277 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 70-66 F/70-66 F/DT”3,828 kg (8,439 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester Hydro 70 is 97% heavier (1,888 kg / 4,162 lb) than the Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 70-66 F (DT/F) and the Hydro 70.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 70-66 F/70-66 F/DT”Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) has 12 to 20 forward gears and the International Harvester Hydro 70 is stepless (CVT) — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 70-66 F (DT/F) and the Hydro 70.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 70-66 F/70-66 F/DT”34 km/h (21.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70”AheadThe International Harvester Hydro 70 has 13% more top speed (4.0 km/h / 2.5 mph) than the Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 70-66 F/70-66 F/DT”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70”AheadThe Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester Hydro 70 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 70-66 F/70-66 F/DT”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Hydro 70.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 70-66 F/70-66 F/DT”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70”AheadThe Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester Hydro 70 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19911973–1976Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester Hydro 70 has 39% more hydraulic flow (12.7 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester Hydro 70 is 97% heavier (1,888 kg / 4,162 lb) than the Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester Hydro 70 has 13% more top speed (4.0 km/h / 2.5 mph) than the Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester Hydro 70 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester Hydro 70 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Fiat 70-66 F (DT/F) has 12 to 20 forward gears and the International Harvester Hydro 70 is stepless (CVT) — not called.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 70-66 F (DT/F) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Hydro 70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources