Fiat 640 (DT) or SAME Minitauro 60?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fiat 640 (DT): three-point lift.
- The Fiat 640 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (290 kg / 639 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 640 (DT) | Minitauro 60 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 39.1 kW (52.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT” | 39.1 kW (52.39 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 640 (DT) and the Minitauro 60. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 640 (DT) and the Minitauro 60. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT” | 21.0 L/min (5.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,250 kg (4,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT” | 1,960 kg (4,321 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60” | AheadThe Fiat 640 (DT) has 15% more lift (290 kg / 639 lb) than the SAME Minitauro 60 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT” | 1,910 kg (4,211 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 640 (DT) is 23% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the SAME Minitauro 60 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 3,700 kg (8,157 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Minitauro 60. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT” | 8 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 640 (DT) and the Minitauro 60. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 640 (DT) and the Minitauro 60. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1973–1982 | 1972–1978 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fiat 640 (DT) has 15% more lift (290 kg / 639 lb) than the SAME Minitauro 60 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat 640 (DT) is 23% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the SAME Minitauro 60 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources