Fiat 60-86 F (F/DT) or SAME Golden 60 Compatto (SAME)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 60-86 F (F/DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Golden 60 Compatto has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fiat 60-86 F (F/DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 10% (3.8 L/min / 1.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The SAME Golden 60 Compatto suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 60-86 F (F/DT) | Golden 60 Compatto | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 44.1 kW (59.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-86 F/60-86 F/DT” | 44.1 kW (59.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 60 Compatto” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 60-86 F (F/DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Golden 60 Compatto has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 60-86 F (F/DT) and the Golden 60 Compatto. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 60-86 F (F/DT) and the Golden 60 Compatto. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-86 F/60-86 F/DT” | 36.2 L/min (9.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 60 Compatto” | AheadThe Fiat 60-86 F (F/DT) has 10% more hydraulic flow (3.8 L/min / 1.0 gpm) than the SAME Golden 60 Compatto (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,375 kg (5,236 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-86 F/60-86 F/DT” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Golden 60 Compatto. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,907 kg (4,204 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-86 F/60-86 F/DT” | 2,340 kg (5,159 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 60 Compatto” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Golden 60 Compatto is 23% heavier (433 kg / 955 lb) than the Fiat 60-86 F (F/DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 60-86 F (F/DT) and the Golden 60 Compatto. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-86 F/60-86 F/DT” | 16 to 30Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 60 Compatto” | Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the Golden 60 Compatto. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 60-86 F (F/DT) and the Golden 60 Compatto. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-86 F/60-86 F/DT” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 60 Compatto” | AheadThe SAME Golden 60 Compatto has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Fiat 60-86 F (F/DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-86 F/60-86 F/DT” | 540/1000 rpmOECD test report 1813, 1999 | AheadThe SAME Golden 60 Compatto offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 60-86 F (F/DT) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-86 F/60-86 F/DT” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 60 Compatto” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-86 F/60-86 F/DT” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 60 Compatto”; OECD test report 1813, 1999 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1992–2000 | 1998–2002 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Golden 60 Compatto is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fiat 60-86 F (F/DT) has 10% more hydraulic flow (3.8 L/min / 1.0 gpm) than the SAME Golden 60 Compatto (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Golden 60 Compatto is 23% heavier (433 kg / 955 lb) than the Fiat 60-86 F (F/DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Golden 60 Compatto has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Fiat 60-86 F (F/DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Golden 60 Compatto offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 60-86 F (F/DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The SAME Golden 60 Compatto is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 60-86 F (F/DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Golden 60 Compatto has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the Golden 60 Compatto.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources