Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) or ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007): hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears, top speed and PTO speeds.
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 101% (33.2 L/min / 8.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 231% (4,037 kg / 8,900 lb) more three-point lift.
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 60-56 LM (DT) | 10641 (2002-2007) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 35.1 kW (47.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-56 LM (DT)” | 35.0 kW (46.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 60-56 LM (DT) and the 10641 (2002-2007). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 60-56 LM (DT) and the 10641 (2002-2007). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 32.8 L/min (8.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-56 LM (DT)” | 66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | AheadThe ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) has 101% more hydraulic flow (33.2 L/min / 8.8 gpm) than the Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,745 kg (3,847 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-56 LM (DT)” | 5,782 kg (12,747 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | AheadThe ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) has 231% more lift (4,037 kg / 8,900 lb) than the Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,190 kg (4,828 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-56 LM (DT)” | 4,275 kg (9,425 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) is 95% heavier (2,085 kg / 4,597 lb) than the Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 60-56 LM (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-56 LM (DT)” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | AheadThe ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) has 100% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 60-56 LM (DT) and the 10641 (2002-2007). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-56 LM (DT)” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | AheadThe ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-56 LM (DT)” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | AheadThe ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-56 LM (DT)” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 60-56 LM (DT)” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1988– | 2002–2007 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) has 101% more hydraulic flow (33.2 L/min / 8.8 gpm) than the Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) has 231% more lift (4,037 kg / 8,900 lb) than the Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) is 95% heavier (2,085 kg / 4,597 lb) than the Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) has 100% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 60-56 LM (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources