Fiat 566 (DT) or Renault 551-4 (S)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fiat 566 (DT): three-point lift.

  • The Fiat 566 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 27% (560 kg / 1,235 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 566 (DT) and Renault 551-4 (S), with the call on each
Question566 (DT)551-4 (S)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”37.0 kW (49.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 551-4 R7454”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 566 (DT) and the 551-4 (S).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 566 (DT) and the 551-4 (S).
Which pumps more oil for implements?27.2 L/min (7.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 551-4 R7454”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 566 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”2,040 kg (4,497 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 551-4 R7454”AheadThe Fiat 566 (DT) has 27% more lift (560 kg / 1,235 lb) than the Renault 551-4 (S) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,380 kg (5,247 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”2,945 kg (6,493 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 551-4 R7454”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 551-4 (S) is 24% heavier (565 kg / 1,246 lb) than the Fiat 566 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 566 (DT) and the 551-4 (S).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 551-4 R7454”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 551-4 R7454”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 566 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 551-4 R7454”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 551-4 R7454”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 551-4 R7454”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 551-4 R7454”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1982–19861976–1986Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 566 (DT) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat 566 (DT) has 27% more lift (560 kg / 1,235 lb) than the Renault 551-4 (S) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 551-4 (S) is 24% heavier (565 kg / 1,246 lb) than the Fiat 566 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 566 (DT) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources