Fiat 566 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 566 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 363 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 566 (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A), with the call on each
Question566 (DT)MF 363 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”43 kW (58 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 566 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 363 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 566 (DT) and the MF 363 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 566 (DT) and the MF 363 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?——No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 566 (DT) and the MF 363 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,380 kg (5,247 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 566 (DT) and the MF 363 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?—YesTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 566 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 363 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 566 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 363 (A).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 566/566 DT”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1982–19861987–1994Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 363 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 363 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 566 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Massey Ferguson 363 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 566 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 363 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources