Fiat 56-66S/56-66 DTS or New Holland 4135 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 56-66S/56-66 DTS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4135 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland 4135 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 41% (875 kg / 1,929 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 56-66S/56-66 DTS and New Holland 4135 (A), with the call on each
Question56-66S/56-66 DTS4135 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 56-66S/56-66 DTS”40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 56-66S/56-66 DTS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4135 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 56-66S/56-66 DTS and the 4135 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 56-66S/56-66 DTS and the 4135 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?34.5 L/min (9.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 56-66S/56-66 DTS”34.5 L/min (9.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,125 kg (4,685 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 56-66S/56-66 DTS”3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”AheadThe New Holland 4135 (A) has 41% more lift (875 kg / 1,929 lb) than the Fiat 56-66S/56-66 DTS (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,125 kg (4,685 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 56-66S/56-66 DTS”2,635 kg (5,809 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 4135 (A) is 24% heavier (510 kg / 1,124 lb) than the Fiat 56-66S/56-66 DTS (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,850 kg (8,488 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 56-66S/56-66 DTS”3,850 kg (8,488 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 56-66S/56-66 DTS”12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 56-66S/56-66 DTS.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 56-66S/56-66 DTS”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 56-66S/56-66 DTS”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 56-66S/56-66 DTS”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 4135 (A).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 56-66S/56-66 DTS”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1992–19951996–1999EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland 4135 (A) has 41% more lift (875 kg / 1,929 lb) than the Fiat 56-66S/56-66 DTS (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 4135 (A) is 24% heavier (510 kg / 1,124 lb) than the Fiat 56-66S/56-66 DTS (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 56-66S/56-66 DTS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4135 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources