Fiat 550 (DT) or International Harvester 485?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 550 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 485 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The International Harvester 485 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 115% (25.1 L/min / 6.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 550 (DT) and International Harvester 485, with the call on each
Question550 (DT)485Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 550/550 DT”38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 550 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 485 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 550 (DT) and the 485.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 550 (DT) and the 485.
Which pumps more oil for implements?21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 550/550 DT”46.9 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”AheadThe International Harvester 485 has 115% more hydraulic flow (25.1 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the Fiat 550 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,820 kg (4,012 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 550/550 DT”1,680 kg (3,704 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 550 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 550/550 DT”); the 485: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,060 kg (4,542 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 550/550 DT”2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 485 is 24% heavier (490 kg / 1,080 lb) than the Fiat 550 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 550 (DT) and the 485.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 550/550 DT”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 550 (DT) and the 485.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 550/550 DT”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 550/550 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”AheadThe International Harvester 485 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 550 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 550 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 550/550 DT”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”AheadThe Fiat 550 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester 485 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1968–19781981–1990Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 485 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester 485 has 115% more hydraulic flow (25.1 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the Fiat 550 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 485 is 24% heavier (490 kg / 1,080 lb) than the Fiat 550 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 485 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 550 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Fiat 550 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester 485 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The International Harvester 485 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 550 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 485 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 550 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 550/550 DT”); the 485: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources