Fiat 540 (DT) or Leyland 344?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Leyland 344: hydraulic flow. On features, the Fiat 540 (DT) is ahead on drive.

  • The Leyland 344 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 42% (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 540 (DT) and Leyland 344, with the call on each
Question540 (DT)344Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?33.3 kW (44.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 540/540 DT”33.5 kW (45.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 540 (DT) and the 344.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 540 (DT) and the 344.
Which pumps more oil for implements?21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 540/540 DT”31.0 L/min (8.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”AheadThe Leyland 344 has 42% more hydraulic flow (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the Fiat 540 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,620 kg (3,571 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 540/540 DT”1,520 kg (3,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,865 kg (4,112 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 540/540 DT”2,125 kg (4,685 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Leyland 344 is 14% heavier (260 kg / 573 lb) than the Fiat 540 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 540 (DT) and the 344.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 540/540 DT”10Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 540 (DT) and the 344.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 540/540 DT”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 540/540 DT”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 540/540 DT”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 540/540 DT”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”AheadThe Fiat 540 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 344 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1973–19821969–1972EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Leyland 344 has 42% more hydraulic flow (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the Fiat 540 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Leyland 344 is 14% heavier (260 kg / 573 lb) than the Fiat 540 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 540 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 344 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources