Fiat 500 E or International Harvester 484?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the International Harvester 484: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on PTO speeds.
- The International Harvester 484 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The International Harvester 484 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 53% (11.5 L/min / 3.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 500 E | 484 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 30.2 kW (40.46 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500 E” | 30.2 kW (40.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 484” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 500 E and the 484. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 500 E and the 484. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500 E” | 33.3 L/min (8.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 484” | AheadThe International Harvester 484 has 53% more hydraulic flow (11.5 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the Fiat 500 E (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,550 kg (3,417 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500 E” | 1,610 kg (3,549 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 484” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 500 E: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500 E”); the 484: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 484”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,725 kg (3,803 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500 E” | 2,330 kg (5,137 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 484” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 484 is 35% heavier (605 kg / 1,334 lb) than the Fiat 500 E (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 500 E and the 484. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500 E” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 484” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 500 E and the 484. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500 E” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 484” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500 E” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 484” | AheadThe International Harvester 484 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 500 E does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500 E” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 484” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500 E” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 484” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1971–1973 | 1977–1981 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 484 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester 484 has 53% more hydraulic flow (11.5 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the Fiat 500 E (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 484 is 35% heavier (605 kg / 1,334 lb) than the Fiat 500 E (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 484 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 500 E does not (as stated by the sources).
- The International Harvester 484 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 500 E: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500 E”); the 484: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 484”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources