Fiat 451 C or ZETOR Super-P?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 451 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super-P has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fiat 451 C suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 32% (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 451 C and ZETOR Super-P, with the call on each
Question451 CSuper-PCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?29.4 kW (39.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 451-C”30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Super P”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 451 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super-P has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 451 C and the Super-P.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 451 C and the Super-P.
Which pumps more oil for implements?16.5 L/min (4.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 451-C”12.5 L/min (3.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Super P”AheadThe Fiat 451 C has 32% more hydraulic flow (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the ZETOR Super-P (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Super P”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 451 C.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,510 kg (5,534 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 451-C”4,495 kg (9,910 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Super P”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR Super-P is 79% heavier (1,985 kg / 4,376 lb) than the Fiat 451 C (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 451 C and the Super-P.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 451-C”5Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Super P”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 451 C and the Super-P.
Which is faster on the road?10.0 km/h (6.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 451-C”15 km/h (9.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Super P”AheadThe ZETOR Super-P has 50% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fiat 451 C (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 451-C”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Super P”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 451 C and the Super-P.
Which drives on both axles?TracksTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 451-C”TracksTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Super P”EvenEven on drive: the same running gear.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1958–19641956–1958EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat 451 C has 32% more hydraulic flow (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the ZETOR Super-P (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR Super-P is 79% heavier (1,985 kg / 4,376 lb) than the Fiat 451 C (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR Super-P has 50% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fiat 451 C (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: the same running gear.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 451 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super-P has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources