Fiat 45-R or MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 45-R has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the M-H 44/6 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 42% (8.4 L/min / 2.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6 suits road haulage better on this data: 31% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 45-R | M-H 44/6 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 45 R” | 32.4 kW (43.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 45-R has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the M-H 44/6 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 45-R and the M-H 44/6. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 45-R and the M-H 44/6. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 20.0 L/min (5.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 45 R” | 28.4 L/min (7.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6” | AheadThe MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6 has 42% more hydraulic flow (8.4 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the Fiat 45-R (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 950 kg (2,094 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 45 R” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the M-H 44/6. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,300 kg (5,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 45 R” | 1,905 kg (4,200 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 45-R is 21% heavier (395 kg / 871 lb) than the MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 45-R and the M-H 44/6. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 45 R” | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 45-R and the M-H 44/6. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 16 km/h (9.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 45 R” | 21 km/h (13.0 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6” | AheadThe MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6 has 31% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fiat 45-R (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 45 R” | 551 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the M-H 44/6. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 45 R” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the M-H 44/6. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 45 R” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1952– | 1946–1951 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 45-R is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6 has 42% more hydraulic flow (8.4 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the Fiat 45-R (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat 45-R is 21% heavier (395 kg / 871 lb) than the MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6 has 31% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fiat 45-R (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat 45-R is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 45-R has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the M-H 44/6 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources