Fiat 420 (DT) or Ford 2610?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 420 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2610 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Ford 2610 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 31% (333 kg / 734 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Fiat 420 (DT) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The Ford 2610 suits road haulage better on this data: 16% (4.0 km/h / 2.5 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 420 (DT) | 2610 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 420/420 DT” | 30.2 kW (40.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 420 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2610 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 420 (DT) and the 2610. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 420 (DT) and the 2610. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 420 (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,080 kg (2,381 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 420/420 DT” | 1,413 kg (3,115 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | AheadThe Ford 2610 has 31% more lift (333 kg / 734 lb) than the Fiat 420 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,650 kg (3,638 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 420/420 DT” | 1,804 kg (3,977 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 420 (DT) and the 2610. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6 to 9Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 420/420 DT” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 420 (DT) and the 2610. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 420/420 DT” | 29 km/h (18.0 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | AheadThe Ford 2610 has 16% more top speed (4.0 km/h / 2.5 mph) than the Fiat 420 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 420/420 DT” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 420/420 DT” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2610. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 420/420 DT” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | AheadThe Fiat 420 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Ford 2610 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1978–1985 | 1981–1983 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Ford 2610 has 31% more lift (333 kg / 734 lb) than the Fiat 420 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 2610 has 16% more top speed (4.0 km/h / 2.5 mph) than the Fiat 420 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat 420 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Ford 2610 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 420 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2610 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources