Fiat 350 V or Renault R 55?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault R 55: three-point lift. On features, the Fiat 350 V is ahead on top speed.

  • The Renault R 55 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 132% (1,025 kg / 2,260 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Fiat 350 V suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 350 V and Renault R 55, with the call on each
Question350 VR 55Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?21.7 kW (29.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 350 V”22.1 kW (29.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 55 R7231”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 350 V and the R 55.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 350 V and the R 55.
Which pumps more oil for implements?14.4 L/min (3.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 350 V”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the R 55.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?775 kg (1,709 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 350 V”1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 55 R7231”AheadThe Renault R 55 has 132% more lift (1,025 kg / 2,260 lb) than the Fiat 350 V (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,348 kg (2,972 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 350 V”1,810 kg (3,990 lb) to 2,030 kg (4,475 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 55 R7231”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault R 55 is 34% heavier (462 kg / 1,019 lb) than the Fiat 350 V (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 350 V and the R 55.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 350 V”6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 55 R7231”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 350 V and the R 55.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 350 V”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 55 R7231”AheadThe Fiat 350 V has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault R 55 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 350 V”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 55 R7231”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 350 V”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 55 R7231”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 350 V”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 55 R7231”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1971–19761967–EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault R 55 has 132% more lift (1,025 kg / 2,260 lb) than the Fiat 350 V (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault R 55 is 34% heavier (462 kg / 1,019 lb) than the Fiat 350 V (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 350 V has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault R 55 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources