Fiat 160-90 (DT) or SAME Hercules 160?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 160-90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Hercules 160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The SAME Hercules 160 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 18% (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 114% (2,854 kg / 6,292 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 160-90 (DT) and SAME Hercules 160, with the call on each
Question160-90 (DT)Hercules 160Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?117.8 kW (158.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 160-90 DT”116.9 kW (156.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Hercules 160”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 160-90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Hercules 160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 160-90 (DT) and the Hercules 160.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 160-90 (DT) and the Hercules 160.
Which pumps more oil for implements?50.8 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 160-90 DT”60.0 L/min (15.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Hercules 160”AheadThe SAME Hercules 160 has 18% more hydraulic flow (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the Fiat 160-90 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,500 kg (5,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 160-90 DT”5,354 kg (11,804 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Hercules 160”AheadThe SAME Hercules 160 has 114% more lift (2,854 kg / 6,292 lb) than the Fiat 160-90 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?6,190 kg (13,647 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 160-90 DT”6,150 kg (13,558 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Hercules 160”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 160-90 DT”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Hercules 160.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 160-90 DT”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Hercules 160”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 160-90 (DT) and the Hercules 160.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 160-90 DT”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Hercules 160”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 160-90 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Hercules 160”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 160-90 DT”independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Hercules 160”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 160-90 DT”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Hercules 160”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19941979–1983Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 160-90 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The SAME Hercules 160 has 18% more hydraulic flow (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the Fiat 160-90 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Hercules 160 has 114% more lift (2,854 kg / 6,292 lb) than the Fiat 160-90 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 160-90 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 160-90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Hercules 160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources