Fiat 140-90 (DT) or International Harvester Farmall 1456?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Fiat 140-90 (DT) is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The Fiat 140-90 (DT) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 140-90 (DT) and International Harvester Farmall 1456, with the call on each
Question140-90 (DT)Farmall 1456Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?94.4 kW (126.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”94.9 kW (127.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 1456”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 140-90 (DT) and the Farmall 1456.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 140-90 (DT) and the Farmall 1456.
Which pumps more oil for implements?50.8 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Farmall 1456.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,350 kg (7,385 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 1456”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 140-90 (DT): lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”); the Farmall 1456: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 1456”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,810 kg (12,809 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”5,806 kg (12,800 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 1456”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Farmall 1456.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 1456”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmall 1456.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 1456”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 1456”AheadThe Fiat 140-90 (DT) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester Farmall 1456 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 140-90 (DT) and the Farmall 1456.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 1456”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19931969–1971Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 140-90 (DT) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat 140-90 (DT) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester Farmall 1456 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Fiat 140-90 (DT) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 140-90 (DT): lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”); the Farmall 1456: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 1456”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources