Fiat 1380 (DT) or Renault 145-14 TX?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 1380 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145-14 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fiat 1380 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 34% (13.5 L/min / 3.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1380 (DT) | 145-14 TX | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1380 (DT)” | 99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1380 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145-14 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1380 (DT) and the 145-14 TX. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1380 (DT) and the 145-14 TX. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 53.5 L/min (14.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1380 (DT)” | 40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | AheadThe Fiat 1380 (DT) has 34% more hydraulic flow (13.5 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Renault 145-14 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,934 kg (10,878 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1380 (DT)” | 5,100 kg (11,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,875 kg (10,748 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1380 (DT)” | 6,170 kg (13,603 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 145-14 TX is 27% heavier (1,295 kg / 2,855 lb) than the Fiat 1380 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,650 kg (19,070 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1380 (DT)” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 145-14 TX. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1380 (DT)” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1380 (DT) and the 145-14 TX. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1380 (DT)” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1380 (DT)” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1380 (DT)” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1380 (DT)” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1979–1984 | 1981–1986 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fiat 1380 (DT) has 34% more hydraulic flow (13.5 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Renault 145-14 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 145-14 TX is 27% heavier (1,295 kg / 2,855 lb) than the Fiat 1380 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1380 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145-14 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources