Fiat 1280 (DT) or Lamborghini R-1256 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 1280 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-1256 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 1280 (DT) and Lamborghini R-1256 (DT), with the call on each
Question1280 (DT)R-1256 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?92 kW (123 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”91.9 kW (123.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1256 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1280 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-1256 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1280 (DT) and the R-1256 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1280 (DT) and the R-1256 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?50.6 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”48.0 L/min (12.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1256 DT”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,710 kg (10,384 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the R-1256 (DT).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,450 kg (12,015 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”4,620 kg (10,185 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1256 DT”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 1280 (DT) is 18% heavier (830 kg / 1,830 lb) than the Lamborghini R-1256 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1280 (DT) and the R-1256 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1256 DT”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1280 (DT) and the R-1256 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1256 DT”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1256 DT”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1256 DT”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1256 DT”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1979–19841978–1984EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat 1280 (DT) is 18% heavier (830 kg / 1,830 lb) than the Lamborghini R-1256 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1280 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-1256 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources