Fiat 1180 (DT) or Ford 8700 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fiat 1180 (DT): three-point lift.

  • The Fiat 1180 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 47% (1,510 kg / 3,329 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 1180 (DT) and Ford 8700 (A), with the call on each
Question1180 (DT)8700 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?74.9 kW (100.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1180 DT”74.2 kW (99.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1180 (DT) and the 8700 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1180 (DT) and the 8700 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1180 (DT) and the 8700 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,710 kg (10,384 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1180 DT”3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”AheadThe Fiat 1180 (DT) has 47% more lift (1,510 kg / 3,329 lb) than the Ford 8700 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,588 kg (10,115 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1180 DT”5,566 kg (12,271 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 8700 (A) is 21% heavier (978 kg / 2,156 lb) than the Fiat 1180 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1180 (DT) and the 8700 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1180 DT”14Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1180 (DT) and the 8700 (A).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1180 DT”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1180 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1180 DT”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1180 DT”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1979–19841976–1979EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat 1180 (DT) has 47% more lift (1,510 kg / 3,329 lb) than the Ford 8700 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 8700 (A) is 21% heavier (978 kg / 2,156 lb) than the Fiat 1180 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources