Fendt Xylon 522 or Fiat 1280 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Xylon 522 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1280 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fendt Xylon 522 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 102% (51.4 L/min / 13.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Fendt Xylon 522 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Xylon 522 and Fiat 1280 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionXylon 5221280 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?92 kW (123 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 522”92 kW (123 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Xylon 522 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1280 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Xylon 522 and the 1280 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Xylon 522 and the 1280 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?102 L/min (26.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 522”50.6 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”AheadThe Fendt Xylon 522 has 102% more hydraulic flow (51.4 L/min / 13.6 gpm) than the Fiat 1280 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,840 kg (15,080 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 522”4,710 kg (10,384 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Xylon 522: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 522”); the 1280 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,850 kg (12,897 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 522”5,450 kg (12,015 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 522”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1280 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?44Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 522”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”AheadThe Fendt Xylon 522 has 83% more forward gears (20 gears) than the Fiat 1280 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Xylon 522 and the 1280 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 522”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”AheadThe Fendt Xylon 522 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Fiat 1280 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/750/1000/1400 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 522”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”AheadThe Fendt Xylon 522 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 1280 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Xylon 522.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 522”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1994–20041979–1984Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Xylon 522 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fendt Xylon 522 has 102% more hydraulic flow (51.4 L/min / 13.6 gpm) than the Fiat 1280 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Xylon 522 has 83% more forward gears (20 gears) than the Fiat 1280 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Xylon 522 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Fiat 1280 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Xylon 522 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 1280 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Fendt Xylon 522 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Xylon 522 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1280 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Xylon 522: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 522”); the 1280 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1280 DT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources