Fendt Xylon 320 or ZETOR 11741?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Xylon 320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 11741 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Xylon 320 | 11741 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 88 kW (118 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 88 kW (118 hp)Wikipedia (pl): Zetor 11741 (open data) | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Xylon 320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 11741 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Xylon 320 and the 11741. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Xylon 320 and the 11741. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 64.0 L/min (16.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Xylon 320. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,800 kg (12,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 11741. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,480 kg (12,081 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 4,696 kg (10,353 lb)Wikipedia (pl): Zetor 11741 (open data) | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Xylon 320 is 17% heavier (784 kg / 1,728 lb) than the ZETOR 11741 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Xylon 320. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 21Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 24Wikipedia (pl): Zetor 11741 (open data) | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Xylon 320 and the 11741. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)” | AheadThe Fendt Xylon 320 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 11741 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1990 | 2002–2007 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 11741 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Xylon 320 is 17% heavier (784 kg / 1,728 lb) than the ZETOR 11741 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Xylon 320 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 11741 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The ZETOR 11741 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Xylon 320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 11741 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources