Fendt Xylon 320 or Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Xylon 320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 630 RX/RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Xylon 320 | Ares 630 RX/RZ | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 88 kW (118 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Xylon 320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 630 RX/RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Xylon 320 and the Ares 630 RX/RZ. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Xylon 320 and the Ares 630 RX/RZ. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 59.9 L/min (15.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Xylon 320. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,800 kg (12,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Xylon 320: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320”); the Ares 630 RX/RZ: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,480 kg (12,081 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 5,496 kg (12,117 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 8,155 kg (17,979 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Xylon 320. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 21Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Xylon 320 and the Ares 630 RX/RZ. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | AheadThe Fendt Xylon 320 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1990 | 1996–2002 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Xylon 320 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Xylon 320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 630 RX/RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Xylon 320: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320”); the Ares 630 RX/RZ: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources