Fendt Fix 2 D or Renault D 16?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Fix 2 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 16 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt Fix 2 D suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 83% (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 50% (400 kg / 882 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Renault D 16 suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Fix 2 D | D 16 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 12.5 kW (16.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 11.8 kW (15.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D16 R7053” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Fix 2 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 16 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Fix 2 D and the D 16. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Fix 2 D and the D 16. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 11.0 L/min (2.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 6.0 L/min (1.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D16 R7053” | AheadThe Fendt Fix 2 D has 83% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Renault D 16 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 800 kg (1,764 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D16 R7053” | AheadThe Fendt Fix 2 D has 50% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the Renault D 16 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,265 kg (2,789 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 1,420 kg (3,131 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D16 R7053” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault D 16 is 12% heavier (155 kg / 342 lb) than the Fendt Fix 2 D (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Fix 2 D and the D 16. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D16 R7053” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 16. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D16 R7053” | AheadThe Renault D 16 has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fendt Fix 2 D (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 570 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault D16 R7053” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Fix 2 D. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D16 R7053” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is dependent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault D16 R7053” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1963–1967 | 1958–1960 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Fix 2 D is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Fix 2 D has 83% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Renault D 16 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Fix 2 D has 50% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the Renault D 16 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault D 16 is 12% heavier (155 kg / 342 lb) than the Fendt Fix 2 D (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault D 16 has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fendt Fix 2 D (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Fix 2 D is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is dependent.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Fix 2 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 16 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO speeds.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources