Fendt Favorit 818 or URSUS 1934?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 818 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1934 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt Favorit 818 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 76% (44.0 L/min / 11.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Favorit 818 | 1934 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 140 kW (188 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | 140 kW (188 hp)Wikipedia (pl): Ursus 1934 (open data) | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 818 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1934 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 818 and the 1934. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 818 and the 1934. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 102.0 L/min (26.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | 58.0 L/min (15.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | AheadThe Fendt Favorit 818 has 76% more hydraulic flow (44.0 L/min / 11.6 gpm) than the URSUS 1934 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Favorit 818. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,680 kg (16,932 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | 6,180 kg (13,625 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Favorit 818 is 24% heavier (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the URSUS 1934 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1934. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 44Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | 16Wikipedia (pl): Ursus 1934 (open data) | AheadThe Fendt Favorit 818 has 175% more forward gears (28 gears) than the URSUS 1934 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1934. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | DifferPTO speeds differ: the Fendt Favorit 818 750/1000 rpm and the URSUS 1934 540/1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 818. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–2002 | 2001–2009 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 1934 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Favorit 818 has 76% more hydraulic flow (44.0 L/min / 11.6 gpm) than the URSUS 1934 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Favorit 818 is 24% heavier (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the URSUS 1934 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Favorit 818 has 175% more forward gears (28 gears) than the URSUS 1934 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The URSUS 1934 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- PTO speeds differ: the Fendt Favorit 818 750/1000 rpm and the URSUS 1934 540/1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 818 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1934 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources