Fendt Favorit 714 Vario or VALMET 8400?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 714 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fendt Favorit 714 Vario suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 52% (37.8 L/min / 10.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Fendt Favorit 714 Vario suits road haulage better on this data: 22% (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) more maximum permissible mass and 25% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Favorit 714 Vario and VALMET 8400, with the call on each
QuestionFavorit 714 Vario8400Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?103 kW (138 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 714 Vario”103.0 kW (138.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8400”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 714 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 714 Vario and the 8400.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 714 Vario and the 8400.
Which pumps more oil for implements?111.0 L/min (29.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 714 Vario”73.2 L/min (19.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8400”AheadThe Fendt Favorit 714 Vario has 52% more hydraulic flow (37.8 L/min / 10.0 gpm) than the VALMET 8400 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—7,065 kg (15,576 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8400”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Favorit 714 Vario.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,750 kg (12,677 lb) to 6,555 kg (14,451 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 714 Vario”5,040 kg (11,111 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8400”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Favorit 714 Vario is 14% heavier (710 kg / 1,565 lb) than the VALMET 8400 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?11,000 kg (24,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 714 Vario”9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8400”AheadThe Fendt Favorit 714 Vario has 22% higher maximum permissible mass (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) than the VALMET 8400 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 714 Vario”12 to 36 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8400”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Fendt Favorit 714 Vario is stepless (CVT) and the VALMET 8400 has 12 to 36 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Favorit 714 Vario and the 8400.
Which is faster on the road?50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 714 Vario”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8400”AheadThe Fendt Favorit 714 Vario has 25% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the VALMET 8400 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 714 Vario”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8400”AheadThe Fendt Favorit 714 Vario offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 8400 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 714 Vario and the 8400.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 714 Vario”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8400”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–1993–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Favorit 714 Vario is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fendt Favorit 714 Vario has 52% more hydraulic flow (37.8 L/min / 10.0 gpm) than the VALMET 8400 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Favorit 714 Vario is 14% heavier (710 kg / 1,565 lb) than the VALMET 8400 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Favorit 714 Vario has 22% higher maximum permissible mass (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) than the VALMET 8400 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Favorit 714 Vario has 25% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the VALMET 8400 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Favorit 714 Vario offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 8400 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Fendt Favorit 714 Vario is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Fendt Favorit 714 Vario is stepless (CVT) and the VALMET 8400 has 12 to 36 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 714 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources