Fendt Favorit 615 LS or John Deere 7700 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 615 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7700 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 7700 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 124% (54.0 L/min / 14.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Favorit 615 LS | 7700 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 110 kW (148 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 615 LS” | 110.4 kW (148.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 615 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7700 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 615 LS and the 7700 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 615 LS and the 7700 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 43.7 L/min (11.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 615 LS” | 97.7 L/min (25.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | AheadThe John Deere 7700 (A) has 124% more hydraulic flow (54.0 L/min / 14.3 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 615 LS (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,800 kg (12,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 615 LS” | 5,560 kg (12,258 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 615 LS: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 615 LS”); the 7700 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,140 kg (13,536 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 615 LS” | 6,510 kg (14,352 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 11,500 kg (25,353 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Favorit 615 LS. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 615 LS” | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 615 LS” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 7700 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 615 LS” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 615 LS” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 615 LS. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 615 LS” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1979–1984 | 1992–1997 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 7700 (A) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 7700 (A) has 124% more hydraulic flow (54.0 L/min / 14.3 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 615 LS (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 7700 (A) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 615 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7700 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 615 LS: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 615 LS”); the 7700 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources