Fendt Favorit 614 SA or Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 614 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D-550 Hydrostat has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fendt Favorit 614 SA suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Favorit 614 SA and Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat, with the call on each
QuestionFavorit 614 SAD-550 HydrostatCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?98.9 kW (132.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”99.2 kW (133.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 614 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D-550 Hydrostat has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 614 SA and the D-550 Hydrostat.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 614 SA and the D-550 Hydrostat.
Which pumps more oil for implements?38.4 L/min (10.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”52.0 L/min (13.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”AheadThe Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat has 35% more hydraulic flow (13.6 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 614 SA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,450 kg (9,811 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”AheadThe Fendt Favorit 614 SA has 53% more lift (1,550 kg / 3,417 lb) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,945 kg (10,902 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Favorit 614 SA is 15% heavier (645 kg / 1,422 lb) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-550 Hydrostat.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Fendt Favorit 614 SA has 16 forward gears and the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat is stepless (CVT) — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D-550 Hydrostat.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”27 km/h (16.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”AheadThe Fendt Favorit 614 SA has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”AheadThe Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Fendt Favorit 614 SA does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D-550 Hydrostat.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1974–19761974EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat has 35% more hydraulic flow (13.6 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 614 SA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Favorit 614 SA has 53% more lift (1,550 kg / 3,417 lb) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Favorit 614 SA is 15% heavier (645 kg / 1,422 lb) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Favorit 614 SA has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Fendt Favorit 614 SA does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Fendt Favorit 614 SA has 16 forward gears and the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat is stepless (CVT) — not called.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 614 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D-550 Hydrostat has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources