Fendt Favorit 614 LSA or Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 614 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Favorit 614 LSA | MF 3655 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 113.5 kW (152.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | 114.1 kW (153.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 614 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 614 LSA and the MF 3655 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 614 LSA and the MF 3655 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 50.6 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Favorit 614 LSA. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,410 kg (16,336 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | 6,400 kg (14,110 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 614 LSA: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA”); the MF 3655 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,530 kg (14,396 lb) to 6,765 kg (14,914 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | 5,360 kg (11,817 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Favorit 614 LSA is 22% heavier (1,170 kg / 2,579 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Favorit 614 LSA. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 3655 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | — | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Favorit 614 LSA. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 614 LSA. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1983–1993 | 1990–1995 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Favorit 614 LSA is 22% heavier (1,170 kg / 2,579 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 614 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 614 LSA: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA”); the MF 3655 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources