Fendt Favorit 611 SA or Lamborghini R-1056 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 611 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-1056 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Lamborghini R-1056 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 28% (10.4 L/min / 2.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Fendt Favorit 611 SA suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Favorit 611 SA | R-1056 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 76.9 kW (103.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA” | 77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 611 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-1056 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 611 SA and the R-1056 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 611 SA and the R-1056 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 37.6 L/min (9.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA” | 48.0 L/min (12.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | AheadThe Lamborghini R-1056 (DT) has 28% more hydraulic flow (10.4 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 611 SA (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,600 kg (7,937 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the R-1056 (DT). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,435 kg (9,778 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA” | 3,930 kg (8,664 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Favorit 611 SA is 13% heavier (505 kg / 1,113 lb) than the Lamborghini R-1056 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-1056 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | — | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the Favorit 611 SA. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-1056 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | AheadThe Fendt Favorit 611 SA has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Lamborghini R-1056 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 611 SA. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1972–1976 | 1977–1984 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini R-1056 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lamborghini R-1056 (DT) has 28% more hydraulic flow (10.4 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 611 SA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Favorit 611 SA is 13% heavier (505 kg / 1,113 lb) than the Lamborghini R-1056 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Favorit 611 SA has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Lamborghini R-1056 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini R-1056 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 611 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-1056 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, forward gears, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources