Fendt 515 C or Lamborghini 150 Racing?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 515 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 150 Racing has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt 515C suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 55% (33.0 L/min / 8.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 515 C | 150 Racing | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 110 kW (148 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 515 C” | 110.3 kW (147.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 515 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 150 Racing has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 515 C and the 150 Racing. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 515 C and the 150 Racing. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 93.0 L/min (24.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 515 C” | 60.0 L/min (15.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | AheadThe Fendt 515C has 55% more hydraulic flow (33.0 L/min / 8.7 gpm) than the Lamborghini 150 Racing (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,895 kg (15,201 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 515 C” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 150 Racing. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,540 kg (12,214 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 515 C” | 5,780 kg (12,743 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 515 C. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | — | 26 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the 515 C. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 515 C” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 150 Racing. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 515 C” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 515 C” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 515 C. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 515 C” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1995–1999 | 1995–2001 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt 515C has 55% more hydraulic flow (33.0 L/min / 8.7 gpm) than the Lamborghini 150 Racing (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 515 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 150 Racing has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, forward gears, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources