Fendt Favorit 514 C or VALMET 8450?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 514 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8450 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt Favorit 514 C suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 39% (28.4 L/min / 7.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Favorit 514 C | 8450 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 102.5 kW (137.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 514 C” | 103 kW (138 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8450” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 514 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8450 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 514 C and the 8450. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 514 C and the 8450. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 102 L/min (26.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 514 C” | 73.6 L/min (19.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8450” | AheadThe Fendt Favorit 514 C has 39% more hydraulic flow (28.4 L/min / 7.5 gpm) than the VALMET 8450 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,885 kg (15,179 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 514 C” | 6,900 kg (15,212 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8450” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 514 C: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 514 C”); the 8450: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8450”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,540 kg (12,214 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 514 C” | 5,310 kg (11,707 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8450” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8450” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Favorit 514 C. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 44Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 514 C” | 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8450” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 514 C” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8450. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 514 C” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8450” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 514 C” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8450” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8450” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 514 C. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 514 C” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8450” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1999 | 1995–2001 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Favorit 514 C has 39% more hydraulic flow (28.4 L/min / 7.5 gpm) than the VALMET 8450 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 514 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8450 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 514 C: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 514 C”); the 8450: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8450”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources