Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA or UTB U-640 (DTC)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Farmer 5 S/SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-640 (DTC) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 69% (15.0 L/min / 4.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 40% (630 kg / 1,389 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Farmer 5 S/SA | U-640 (DTC) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.6 kW (63.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA” | 47.1 kW (63.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 640” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 5 S/SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-640 (DTC) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Farmer 5 S/SA and the U-640 (DTC). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Farmer 5 S/SA and the U-640 (DTC). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.6 L/min (9.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA” | 21.6 L/min (5.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 640” | AheadThe Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA has 69% more hydraulic flow (15.0 L/min / 4.0 gpm) than the UTB U-640 (DTC) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA” | 1,570 kg (3,461 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 640” | AheadThe Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA has 40% more lift (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the UTB U-640 (DTC) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,945 kg (6,493 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA” | 2,020 kg (4,453 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 640” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA is 46% heavier (925 kg / 2,039 lb) than the UTB U-640 (DTC) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the U-640 (DTC). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 13Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 640” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 640” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmer 5 S/SA. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA” | 24 km/h (14.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 640” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 640” | AheadThe Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the UTB U-640 (DTC) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Farmer 5 S/SA and the U-640 (DTC). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 640” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1970–1972 | 1982–1985 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The UTB U-640 (DTC) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA has 69% more hydraulic flow (15.0 L/min / 4.0 gpm) than the UTB U-640 (DTC) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA has 40% more lift (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the UTB U-640 (DTC) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA is 46% heavier (925 kg / 2,039 lb) than the UTB U-640 (DTC) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the UTB U-640 (DTC) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The UTB U-640 (DTC) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 5 S/SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-640 (DTC) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources