Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA or Renault 651 (S)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Farmer 5 S/SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 651 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 41% (10.6 L/min / 2.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 10% (275 kg / 606 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA and Renault 651 (S), with the call on each
QuestionFarmer 5 S/SA651 (S)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?47.6 kW (63.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA”47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 651 R7461”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 5 S/SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 651 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Farmer 5 S/SA and the 651 (S).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Farmer 5 S/SA and the 651 (S).
Which pumps more oil for implements?36.6 L/min (9.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA”26.0 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 651 R7461”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA has 41% more hydraulic flow (10.6 L/min / 2.8 gpm) than the Renault 651 (S) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA”2,240 kg (4,938 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 651 R7461”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,945 kg (6,493 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA”2,670 kg (5,886 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 651 R7461”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA is 10% heavier (275 kg / 606 lb) than the Renault 651 (S) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 651 (S).
Which has the wider choice of gears?13Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA”12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 651 R7461”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?—YesTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 651 R7461”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmer 5 S/SA.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 651 R7461”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 651 R7461”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 651 (S) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 651 R7461”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Farmer 5 S/SA.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 651 R7461”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 651 (S) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1970–19721972–1986EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA has 41% more hydraulic flow (10.6 L/min / 2.8 gpm) than the Renault 651 (S) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA is 10% heavier (275 kg / 606 lb) than the Renault 651 (S) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 651 (S) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Fendt Farmer 5 S/SA is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 651 (S) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 5 S/SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 651 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources