Fendt Farmer 310 or Massey Ferguson MF 6260 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Farmer 310 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6260 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6260 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 28% (20.7 L/min / 5.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Farmer 310 and Massey Ferguson MF 6260 (A), with the call on each
QuestionFarmer 310MF 6260 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?77 kW (103 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 310”77.3 kW (103.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6260”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 310 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6260 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Farmer 310 and the MF 6260 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Farmer 310 and the MF 6260 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?75.0 L/min (19.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 310”95.7 L/min (25.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6260”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6260 (A) has 28% more hydraulic flow (20.7 L/min / 5.5 gpm) than the Fendt Farmer 310 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,140 kg (11,332 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 310”6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6260”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Farmer 310: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 310”); the MF 6260 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6260”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,900 kg (10,803 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 310”4,515 kg (9,954 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6260”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 310”8,800 kg (19,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6260”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?21Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 310”16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6260”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmer 310 and the MF 6260 (A).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 310”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6260”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 310”540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6260”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 310 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson MF 6260 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Farmer 310 and the MF 6260 (A).
Which drives on both axles?4WD / 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 310”; Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 310 LSA”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6260”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–20011999–2003Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 6260 (A) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6260 (A) has 28% more hydraulic flow (20.7 L/min / 5.5 gpm) than the Fendt Farmer 310 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 310 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson MF 6260 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6260 (A) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 310 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6260 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Farmer 310: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 310”); the MF 6260 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6260”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources