Fendt Farmer 304 LSA or Renault 80-32 PX?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Farmer 304 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80-32 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fendt Farmer 304 LSA suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Farmer 304 LSA and Renault 80-32 PX, with the call on each
QuestionFarmer 304 LSA80-32 PXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?55.2 kW (74 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LSA/Turbo”55.2 kW (74.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 304 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80-32 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Farmer 304 LSA and the 80-32 PX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Farmer 304 LSA and the 80-32 PX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—31.9 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Farmer 304 LSA.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,860 kg (6,305 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LSA/Turbo”3,825 kg (8,433 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Farmer 304 LSA: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LSA/Turbo”); the 80-32 PX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,510 kg (7,738 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LSA/Turbo”3,220 kg (7,099 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Farmer 304 LSA and the 80-32 PX.
Which has the wider choice of gears?21Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LSA/Turbo”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmer 304 LSA and the 80-32 PX.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LSA/Turbo”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LSA/Turbo”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 304 LSA offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 80-32 PX does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Farmer 304 LSA.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LSA/Turbo”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 304 LSA is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 80-32 PX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19981989–1993EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fendt Farmer 304 LSA offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 80-32 PX does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Fendt Farmer 304 LSA is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 80-32 PX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 304 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80-32 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Farmer 304 LSA: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LSA/Turbo”); the 80-32 PX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources