Fendt Farmer 304 LS or Steyr 8070 (a)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Farmer 304 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8070 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fendt Farmer 304 LS suits road haulage better on this data: 18% (700 kg / 1,543 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Farmer 304 LS and Steyr 8070 (a), with the call on each
QuestionFarmer 304 LS8070 (a)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?42.6 kW (57.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8070”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 304 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8070 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Farmer 304 LS and the 8070 (a).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Farmer 304 LS and the 8070 (a).
Which pumps more oil for implements?40.7 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 8070 (a).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,140 kg (4,718 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8070”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Farmer 304 LS: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”); the 8070 (a): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8070”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,110 kg (6,856 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”2,587 kg (5,703 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8070”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Farmer 304 LS is 20% heavier (523 kg / 1,153 lb) than the Steyr 8070 (a) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,700 kg (10,362 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8070”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 304 LS has 18% higher maximum permissible mass (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Steyr 8070 (a) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?15Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”16Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8070”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmer 304 LS and the 8070 (a).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8070”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8070”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 304 LS offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Steyr 8070 (a) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Farmer 304 LS and the 8070 (a).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8070”AheadThe Steyr 8070 (a) is available with four-wheel drive; the Fendt Farmer 304 LS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1982–19891979–1992EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fendt Farmer 304 LS is 20% heavier (523 kg / 1,153 lb) than the Steyr 8070 (a) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 304 LS has 18% higher maximum permissible mass (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Steyr 8070 (a) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 304 LS offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Steyr 8070 (a) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Steyr 8070 (a) is available with four-wheel drive; the Fendt Farmer 304 LS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 304 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8070 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Farmer 304 LS: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”); the 8070 (a): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8070”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources