Fendt Farmer 304 LS or John Deere 2100 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Farmer 304 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fendt Farmer 304 LS suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 28% (8.9 L/min / 2.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The John Deere 2100 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Farmer 304 LS and John Deere 2100 (A), with the call on each
QuestionFarmer 304 LS2100 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?42.6 kW (57.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”42 kW (56 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2100”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 304 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Farmer 304 LS and the 2100 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Farmer 304 LS and the 2100 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?40.7 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”31.8 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2100”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 304 LS has 28% more hydraulic flow (8.9 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the John Deere 2100 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,140 kg (4,718 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2100”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Farmer 304 LS: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”); the 2100 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2100”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,110 kg (6,856 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”2,985 kg (6,581 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2100”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,700 kg (10,362 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”5,500 kg (12,125 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2100”AheadThe John Deere 2100 (A) has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the Fendt Farmer 304 LS (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?15Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2100”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 304 LS has 50% more forward gears (5 gears) than the John Deere 2100 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmer 304 LS and the 2100 (A).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2100”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 304 LS has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 2100 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2100”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 304 LS offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 2100 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Farmer 304 LS and the 2100 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2100”AheadThe John Deere 2100 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Fendt Farmer 304 LS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1982–19891993–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2100 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fendt Farmer 304 LS has 28% more hydraulic flow (8.9 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the John Deere 2100 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere 2100 (A) has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the Fendt Farmer 304 LS (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 304 LS has 50% more forward gears (5 gears) than the John Deere 2100 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 304 LS has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 2100 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 304 LS offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 2100 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The John Deere 2100 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Fendt Farmer 304 LS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The John Deere 2100 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 304 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Farmer 304 LS: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”); the 2100 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2100”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources