Fendt Farmer 303 LSA or International Harvester 485?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Farmer 303 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 485 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The International Harvester 485 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (6.2 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Fendt Farmer 303 LSA suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 26% (665 kg / 1,466 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
  • The Fendt Farmer 303 LSA suits road haulage better on this data: 60% (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Farmer 303 LSA and International Harvester 485, with the call on each
QuestionFarmer 303 LSA485Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?38.1 kW (51.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 303 LSA”38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 303 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 485 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Farmer 303 LSA and the 485.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Farmer 303 LSA and the 485.
Which pumps more oil for implements?40.7 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 303 LSA”46.9 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”AheadThe International Harvester 485 has 15% more hydraulic flow (6.2 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Fendt Farmer 303 LSA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,680 kg (3,704 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Farmer 303 LSA.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,215 kg (7,088 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 303 LSA”2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Farmer 303 LSA is 26% heavier (665 kg / 1,466 lb) than the International Harvester 485 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 303 LSA”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 485.
Which has the wider choice of gears?15Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 303 LSA”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmer 303 LSA and the 485.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 303 LSA”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 303 LSA has 60% more top speed (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) than the International Harvester 485 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/650/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 303 LSA”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 303 LSA offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester 485 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 303 LSA”independentTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 303 LSA”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 303 LSA is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester 485 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1982–19851981–1990EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester 485 has 15% more hydraulic flow (6.2 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Fendt Farmer 303 LSA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 303 LSA is 26% heavier (665 kg / 1,466 lb) than the International Harvester 485 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 303 LSA has 60% more top speed (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) than the International Harvester 485 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 303 LSA offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester 485 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Fendt Farmer 303 LSA is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester 485 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 303 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 485 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources